Installing The Office 2016 Technical Previewĭon’t get your hopes up about your new ability to add ink equations to your Word 2016 document.Second Attempt At Installing Office 2016 Preview.Features That Different Microsoft Word Versions Support.Recover Lost Changes To A Word Document.Probably elements of a formula can then accept text attributes in the same way as ordinary text does. Having inspected (first time in life) an DOCX file, it seems that Word there is treating formulas as special parts of the general text. To get it displayed in the correct place it (the hosting frame) an anchor is placed somewere in the text. It’s not inside the top-level content.xml there, but in an additional content.xml placed in a wrapped-in subfolder. In LibO a Math formula is inserted as an OLE object, and it is saved in the respective way in the file. (I used Notepad++ with extensions.)Ī bug report may help to get it clear (at least) if the missing attributes in the exported vesions actually are a bug, or were knowingly accepted due to fundamental incompatibilities. It may even be possible (though not simple), to do it with the help of an XML editor. If the MS way to describe Formulas and to write them to files has means at all for the needed attributes, and you know a text describing them correctly, you can probably wite some code (in a general purpose programming language) to “repair” the bad export in the file. I personally can’t tell you anything concerning this additional question. I don’t know if that slang has a way to set the “bold” attribute at all. The respective content of the OOXML file isn’t MathML at all, but some slang I don’t know anything of.
The document.xml wrapped into the OOXML file (which contains the MathML part) nowhere has a related tag to a “bold” setting, while the ODF version of my reworked example contained
Problem seems to be introduced on export.
I meanwhile did, and learned that the “bold” attribute actually was missing in both the re-loaded DOCX versions. I didn’t yet experiment with your specific issue concerning boöls parts. Of course, TDF may be expected to know OOXML better than MS. My test with the two supported (by LibO) variants of DOCX written by LibO V 7.2.3.2 resulted in files at least correctly re-read with LibO. Since ODF is writing formulas to files in MathML code, and Word (or some associated component) can interpret MathML as I was told here (silly clip instead of clear info sorry), your results on export may seriously depend on the version of your LibO and of the Word another party is using. I also can’t test with any MS Word, but the export to DOCX (whereof even MS seems to not know how this “international standard” is actually specified) was improved more than once.
0 kommentar(er)
